Archive for October, 2011

Fame-Girls Sandra Set 171

Published by webmodelsindex on October 30th, 2011 - in Model Updates

I kept thinking of different ways to start out this review of Sandra’s latest set. Just could not think of anything. Sure, Sandra is gorgeous. She has a smoking body, and a pretty face. But there is just something about her that screams boring. Plain. Uninteresting. No clue what it is. I just can’t find myself looking forward to her new sets. Virginia? Yes. I’d bang the shit out of her. Ella? Hell yeah. Though with Ella I find myself wanting to cuddle more than fuck for some reason.

While it’s true that the Fame-Girls site has taken some sets to the next level, 1/3 of the site still seems to remain the same. Why is it that Sandra was more wild when she was younger? Why is she so tame now? I guess if you have to compare it to something, you can compare it to Janice that was added to Fame-Girls for 1 week before being removed. Once you go past the tame, going back just doesn’t work.

Maybe the change to the Fame-Girls site is still in it’s early stages. Maybe, just maybe, once people get bored with Virginia, and sales drop, then we might get to see more out of Sandra and/or Ella. Maybe. But for the time being, Virginia and Ella is all I need to keep me paying. To keep me interested. If Sandra wants to stop disappointing her fans, more power to her. But for now, she’s out of her game. And to be honest, she is no longer in league with Virginia and Ella.

My 2 cents.

http://www.webmodelsindex.com/gallery.php?n=Sandra&s=171

 

Tags: , , , , , ,
21 Comments »

Virginia’s Set 170: NOT Altered

Published by webmodelsindex on October 27th, 2011 - in Model Updates

There have been quite a few comments lately about how the owner of Fame-Girls had edited Virginia’s latest set to hide her pussy. I’m here to tell you guys, it’s not true. None of the images in her 170th set has been altered. I come to you today with proof of that fact.

The 3 images in question are these:

   (Click for the larger images)

The first image is impossible to see her pussy because of the way she is sitting, and the angle of the camera. The third one as well. The angle is too close to her thigh. That leaves the middle one. Should her pussy be visible in that pictures? Yes, BUT, because of the shape of her pussy, it’s not visible. I’ll explain why in a second.

If this was someone else, say Ella for example, her pussy would have been visible. That’s because Ella has a huge pussy. Her lips are insanely huge. An example would be in this picture:

 (Click for the larger image)

See how her pussy protrudes outwards? Because of that, if she were the one in the second image above, her pussy would have been visible. Well, part of it would have been.

Virginia has a completely different type of pussy lips. Hers is a lot more narrow, and does not protrude outward. Because of that, her slit is not visible because her dress is BARELY covering it. Want proof? Here ya go!

I took image 76 from set 168 of Virginia’s, and ran it through Adobe. I changed the color balance, hue and saturation, and lighting. Nothing else was altered. By doing so, I tried to match her pussy to her skin color the best I could, and by doing so made it very visible. Here is the original image:

 (Click for the larger image)

And here are the different stages of the color and light alterations:

      

As you can see from the different stages above, Virginia has a very narrow pussy. Her slit is not protruding because she has very small lips. Now if you compare the last image directly above to the second image at the top, you would be able to see her slit would not be visible in set 170.

Still don’t see it?

 

So don’t give up on Fame-Girls just yet. They haven’t been editing sets for the past few months, and there is no reason for them to start that up again. Save your judgments after the next few weeks. Some of the upcoming sets from all three girls look like they might be really great.

Tags: , , , , , ,
10 Comments »

Fame-Girls Ella Set 170

Published by webmodelsindex on October 27th, 2011 - in Model Updates

Fame-Girls Ella Set 170

Ella’s new set has her looking super cute, as always. A wee bit on the tame side, except for a few images like the one above where she teases with the front of her shorts. Doesn’t actually show anything, but still sorta sexy.

She doesn’t do much teasing with her top, which is a shame since she has the nicest tummy out of the three. No ass either, sadly. But hey, it’s Ella. She’s always hot no matter what she’s wearing.

http://www.webmodelsindex.com/gallery.php?n=Ella&s=170

 

Tags: , , , , , ,
4 Comments »

Fame-Girls Virginia Set 170

Published by webmodelsindex on October 25th, 2011 - in Model Updates

Fame-Girls Virginia Set 170

The review for this set can be summed up in two words:  No. Panties.

http://www.webmodelsindex.com/gallery.php?n=Virginia&s=170

Tags: , , , , , ,
23 Comments »

Fame-Girls Sandra Set 170

Published by webmodelsindex on October 23rd, 2011 - in Model Updates

Fame-Girls Sandra Set 170

Decent set from Sandra this week. I would call the set tame, but that’s a bit redundant. Her sets are always tame. Or are they?

The outfit is cute I guess. Would rather see it on Ella, but hey, still looks good on Sandra. A couple times it looked as though a tit might pop out, but no such luck. The outfit also seems to be made out of cotton, so I was kinda hoping for at least a wet spot. Again, no luck there either.

Next weeks set doesn’t seem like it gets any better. But the four after next week seems like they may have potential. Then back to tame on week six. Here are some of the up coming previews.

 Set 171 – 10/30/11: This set looks like it will be tame.

 Set 172 – 11/06/11: Looks promising. Panties seem super lacey.

 Set 173 – 11/13/11: Also promising. Panties look to be mesh. Maybe some see-through?

 Set 174 – 11/20/11: No panties? Super see-through? It’s about time!

 Set 175 – 11/27/11: Again no panties. The top is also very revealing.

 Set 176 – 12/04/11: And then it’s back to tame.

Tags: , , , , , ,
3 Comments »

Fame-Girls Ella Set 169

Published by webmodelsindex on October 20th, 2011 - in Model Updates

Fame-Girls Ella Set 169

Ella looks amazingly cute in her latest set. Unfortunately, this set is also rather tame. Would have been much better if she kept the ribbon in her hair throughout the whole set. But it’s Ella. Tame set or not, she’s still super hot.

http://www.webmodelsindex.com/gallery.php?n=Ella&s=169

Tags: , , , , , ,
No Comments »

Fame-Girls Virginia Set 169

Published by webmodelsindex on October 18th, 2011 - in Model Updates

Fame-Girls Virginia Set 169

Mixed feelings about Virginia’s new set.

On one hand, her body looks amazing. Nice and toned. She’s also not wearing a shirt, even from the very first picture. Seems it was just a scarf, and she takes it off rather early in the set.

On the other hand, although she is topless for most of the set, she tries her hardest to keep her tits covered. Sure, there are a few slips here and there, but that’s all they are, slips.

I do like the set, don’t get me wrong. It’s just a little late in the game to be so coy.

http://www.webmodelsindex.com/gallery.php?n=Virginia&s=169

Tags: , , , , , ,
2 Comments »

Fame-Girls Sandra Set 169

Published by webmodelsindex on October 16th, 2011 - in Model Updates

Fame-Girls Sandra Set 169

We have a rather interesting set from Sandra.

First, the top isn’t like the other see-through tops she normally wears, but actual gaps in it for tons of nipple viewing. Second, on some of the pictures, it looks like she didn’t shave very well. And third, the size of the images are much smaller.

Let’s start with the dress. I haven’t seen her wear it before, which is a nice change. Though I doubt I’ll ever see it again because she rips it to shreds. A dress that shows her nipples, and gets ripped off her body? +1. Definitely hot.

For the shaving comment, I don’t think it’s to the point of where she’s growing a bush, but it does look like she hasn’t shaved for a few days. I think some of you might like that.

The image sizes. Someone pointed it out last week that the preview image was smaller in dimensions than normal. Well, you were right. The average vertical dimension is 1168×1752 and horizontal is 1752×1168. Shame really. We finally get a decent set from Sandra, but we can’t act like pervs and zoom in really far.

Good news is that this set has more images than a normal set as well. 149 total images. So my question is this; would you guys rather have 20 or so images added to the set, or have the larger image dimensions? Of course I have no say in it, but I’d like to know what you guys think.

All in all, great set. One of the best released in the past few months from Sandra.

http://www.webmodelsindex.com/gallery.php?n=Sandra&s=169

Tags: , , , , , ,
7 Comments »

Fame-Girls Ella Set 168

Published by webmodelsindex on October 13th, 2011 - in Model Updates

Fame-Girls Ella Set 168

Ella is looking mighty fine this week. A lot more ass shots than usual, which is always a plus, and we even have a couple side boob shots. I’m sure Ella fans will be pleased.

Really not much more to say, other than Ella is smoking hot. Keep up the good work!

http://www.webmodelsindex.com/gallery.php?n=Ella&s=168

Tags: , , , , , ,
5 Comments »

Fame-Girls Virginia Set 168

Published by webmodelsindex on October 11th, 2011 - in Model Updates

Fame-Girls Virginia Set 168

Really hot set from Virginia this week. She’s looking super sexy.

Couple shots where you see her nipples, which is also a plus, and her panties are also somewhat see-through. I changed the color balance on a couple shots, and I was able to see her juicy bits below them. So I’m sure some of you will have some fun with that.

This set is also more on the sexy side than most of her previous sets. So you Virginia fans out there might really like this set. I’ll let you guys decide.

http://www.webmodelsindex.com/gallery.php?n=Virginia&s=168

Tags: , , , , , ,
9 Comments »
© WMI Blog