Archive for February, 2012

Fame-Girls Virginia Set 189

Published by webmodelsindex on February 28th, 2012 - in Model Updates

We have another pretty hot set from Virginia this week. Picture this… Virginia, on her back, panties off, legs spread, rubbing her clit with a vibrator. This set doesn’t actually have that, but wouldn’t it be awesome if it did?

The outfit she’s wearing works well with her level of teasing. We know she doesn’t mind showing tits, and we know that 99% of the time the panties don’t stay on her. Mix that with a see through nightie, and it’s a win win.

We have tons of nipples. Always a plus with Virginia since she has perfect perky nipples. The panties she’s wearing (until she takes them off) are as see through as the nightie she’s wearing. There are 5 or 6 spread shots with them on, that allows us to see the goods. Not the best quality, and some are a bit dark, but it’s still damn nice.

About half way through she takes the panties off, and does a lot of teasing with the nightie. Sometimes its up on her chest, allowing us to see her lower half through it, sometimes the nightie is down around her waist. Hell, sometimes it’s below her waist as well. I usually don’t have trouble describing a set from Fame-Girls, but I will say at least this; This is another set that you have to go through slowly, just to make sure you don’t miss anything.

The next two sets will be of Ella. We’ll see Virginia again next Tuesday. If you haven’t seen the new previews for Fame-Girls yet, it’s the blog post before this one.

Support The Site Link Preview: Fame-Girls Virginia Set 189

Direct Link Preview: Fame-Girls Virginia Set 189

Fame-Girls Preview Update

Published by webmodelsindex on February 28th, 2012 - in Model Updates

Here are the newest previews to the Fame-Girls website. Thanks to DMD, we have the previews before they were changed, which I will include here. Please note that these images are re-sized and not the original dimensions. Had something to do with my email client not liking the big images, or some crap.

First up, we have the sexy Virginia.

   

And then we have the lovely Ella.

    

Don’t let the number of images fool you, its only five new previews. DMD just happened to save the old previews, so they were thrown up there with the new. Its only two new Virginia previews, and three new Ella previews. And yes, the Christmas style set from Ella does look hot.

Fame-Girls Virginia Set 188

Published by webmodelsindex on February 26th, 2012 - in Model Updates

Super hot set from Virginia this week.

She is looking great in this set. The light makeup, the healthy skin color, and having her hair up to show off her neck and shoulders. A real beauty.

The outfit she is wearing is sexy. All of it see-through. You can see through the top rather well in almost all the pictures where she had her top on still, but sadly, you aren’t able to see any pussy through the panties. However, there are a lot of shots where she is sitting down with her legs open some, and quite honestly, the panties can’t seem to keep her pussy inside them. So even though you can’t see through them, you don’t have to.

She does eventually take her top off. There are even a couple bare breast shots. Not as much as previous sets, but still some. Once the top comes off, it’s mainly shots from behind. I’m not complaining since she has a great ass. And since her skin color doesn’t look burnt like it had in some sets, her smooth back and skin looks amazing.

The set itself is rather large. 360mb in zip form with 110 images. Could be because of the background she used for this set, which I don’t think we have seen before. Actually, I just checked after the last sentence. She has used this place before in sets 38 and 112. But who’s really looking at the background and not the eye candy? Shame on you.

Hot set, I’d give it an 8 out of 10.

Support The Set Link Preview: Fame-Girls Virginia Set 188

Direct Link Preview: Fame-Girls Virginia Set 188

P.S. Sorry it took so long to post, Fame-Girls was lagging and the set took forever to download.

P.S.S. Stop requesting Sandra in the Request Model form on webmodelsindex.com, every Sandra set has already been posted. There is nothing else to post.

Fame-Girls Ella Set 187

Published by webmodelsindex on February 23rd, 2012 - in Model Updates

I’ll be honest… I’m not digging this set at all. The hair, makeup, outfit… all horrible. Image quality is also not that great.

I love Ella, I really do. I think she is God’s gift to man. But this is a set I want to erase from memory. I don’t like giving bad reviews, and this is probably the first bad review I’ve given for Ella. But this blog is about honesty, so I had to be honest. Sorry all.

Ella’s set next week does look better, so I’m looking forward to that. And the week after next, she’ll have a set on Monday and Friday (Sunday and Friday for those who read this blog). Anyone else excited about the new rotation between Virginia and Ella? Doesn’t matter who starts out on Monday, it’s still a win/win either way. Well, besides this set at least.

Support The Site Link Preview: Fame-Girls Ella Set 187

Direct Link Preview: Fame-Girls Ella Set 187

Fame-Girls Virginia Set 187

Published by webmodelsindex on February 21st, 2012 - in Model Updates

Strange. After seeing this set, I have a theory that Sandra didn’t leave because of marriage and a child.  I think she left because of the direction that Fame-Girls is going. I’ll try to explain the best I can.

For the past 8 months, Virginia has been taking her sets further and further. However, the nipple shots weren’t truly done on purpose. It’s one of those things where she didn’t try hard to cover up, but she didn’t blatantly show them either. This set? She is doing it on purpose.

The set starts out with her teasing with her tits. By image 15, you see a full one. By image 31, she starts taking off her panties. They didn’t come fully off, as you can see with the image above. But the teasing she did with them is the furthest she has taken it so far.

By the end of the set, she is topless, but sadly, not bottomless. Image 31 to 38 is pretty much the only panty teasing she does. The theory that I stated above is that I think future sets coming from Fame-Girls will be a lot more risque, which we see from this set and the recent bath set from Ella. Yes, I believe her sets will be taken further than what they are now as well.

This set is great, and a step in the right direction. I also want to point out that she looks extremely beautiful in this set. Her eyebrows are fuller, and her skin color is perfect. Now if she would only go back to the reddish hair color.

Next Sunday’s set from Virginia looks great, and the one from her next Tuesday is even better. It’s the two sets of hers listed in this blog post: http://www.wminews.com/fame-girls-preview-update/

And now, on to the 20 image preview.

Support The Site Link Preview: Fame-Girls Virginia Set 187

Direct Link Preview: Fame-Girls Virginia Set 187

 

Suggest A Model Feature

Published by webmodelsindex on February 21st, 2012 - in Webmaster

This feature has been on the site for less than a month, but I’ve already received over a thousand requests. However, 99.99% of them I can not do.

I understand that Fame-Girls Sandra used to be a child model. I get that. But this is an 18+ only website based in the United States. The only sets on this site are of models who are 18 or over. So why do people assume, even when the suggest a model form says 18+ only, that I’m going to start posting underage models?

Some of the requests were even flat out disgusting. Maybe 50 or so were of “preteen _____”, with the blank part being a wide range of vulgar things. A lot of vladmodels requests as well. It will never happen.

There was a comment submitted last night on the blog review of Sandra’s last set, that said “Does she have a daughter? Now theres a thought….Sandra the next generation.“. That’s extremely poor taste. Some of you might not think it is, but to me, I found it distasteful.

I am sorry if this post seems like I’m angry, because quite frankly, I am. However, if I pissed anyone off, I’m sorry. More than likely I’ll lose some people to this post. And more than likely I’ll lose even more after I say what I’m about to say.

Any new comments made on this blog site that mentions underage models or children, will be deleted. If it’s a long winded comment, and there is just a single line that mentions an underage model, I may just delete that line and allow the comment. I am tired of seeing the comments, and I’m tired of people assuming that I would allow it. If worse comes to worse, I’ll remove all 3 Fame-Girls models from both this site and the TGP site.

/end rant

Fame-Girls Sandra Set 187

Published by webmodelsindex on February 19th, 2012 - in Model Updates

It’s a sad day for the internet, the beloved Sandra Orlow (now known as Sandra Kisterskaya), has retired. Will she go out with a bang? Let’s find out.

First, let’s talk size. The set itself is pretty large. 354mb in zip form. Each image is between 2.8 and 3.6 mb each. It’s a shame that even though the image size is large, the images themselves are a bit grainy. The lighting just didn’t do her image justice.

As for her, I must admit that she looks rather happy in this set. A thing that’s been lost on her as of late. We have some great ass shots, camel toe shots, as well as some pretty good see through nipple shots. However, it doesn’t go past that. I know a lot of us was hoping she would have made her last set memorable, but it looks to be just another Sandra set. Nothing really special about it.

It’s sad to see her go, and to be honest, I don’t think she will be back. Will she be missed? Probably. I know some of you are still a fan of hers. As for myself, I’m just glad that I get to see more of Virginia and Ella. Speaking of which, it looks like Virginia will be the first one up next Sunday.

Anyways, I’d like to hear what you guys think about Sandra retiring. I know the Fame-Girls site says that she’s just taking a break, but I don’t really think it’s a break, more like retirement. What do you guys think?

Support The Site Link Preview: Fame-Girls Sandra Set 187

Direct Link Preview: Fame-Girls Sandra Set 187

Fame-Girls Preview Update

Published by webmodelsindex on February 19th, 2012 - in Model Updates

Three more image previews were added to the Fame-Girls Website. One for Ella, two for Virginia.

  

It looks like after this week is done and there are no more Sandra updates, Virginia might start off the new week rotation. She is currently one up on Ella. Not including the sets from this coming week, Virginia has four previews posted. Ella only has three.

Of course we won’t know until later tonight to see who will start off the next week.

Fame-Girls Ella Set 186

Published by webmodelsindex on February 16th, 2012 - in Model Updates

Damn I love this girl in a dress and panty hose.

The set is pretty small, at only 80mb’s. 124 images, and whats weird, is the quality is really nice. Not pixelated, or grainy. Really great detail. With all that out of the way, on to the set.

At first glance, 123 of 124 images are super tame. I personally do not mind, since I think Ella is God’s gift to man. But that one image, just the one, is what makes this set great. Picture this if you will, Ella, on her back, legs open, pussy in full view. Yes, the panty hose has a guard, but one of those thin ones, and with the angle at which she’s laying, it’s off to the side a bit.

Some of you will come back later after you’ve seen the set, and tell me I’m seeing things. But I’m not. I ran the image through Adobe just to confirm what I saw. Yes, it’s the real deal. No you don’t need Adobe to see it. It’s plain as day. Adobe just enhances it.

Sadly, the one image in this discussion is a sideways image, so it will not be included in the preview.

Support The Site Link Preview: Fame-Girls Ella Set 186

Direct Link Preview: Fame-Girls Ella Set 186

Ninja Edit:

The “Support The Site Link Preview” takes you the preview page the same as the other link, but it displays a banner at the top that you can disable. It will not hold you up, or delay you from seeing the preview. Just a banner at the top, nothing more.

For those that have clicked it, I thank you. For those that haven’t, well, God killed a kitten because of you. Just so you know.

Linkbucks Links On The Site

Published by webmodelsindex on February 15th, 2012 - in Webmaster

Last month I had to upgrade my hosting to a dedicated server because I was using too many server resources on a shared server. Not too bad in the long run, since I have a server all to myself to use and abuse. However, the cost in hosting has jumped. Before, I was only paying $19.90 a month for hosting my blog and main website (webmodelsindex.com). Now? I’m paying $156.00 a month. A huge jump, and to be honest, I’m not making more than I’m spending.

I originally created my main site to make a bit of extra cash each month. However, over time it wasn’t about the money, it was more about the community. But now that I’m losing money, I need to take steps to keep the site afloat. That’s why I’ll be adding linkbucks links. Don’t worry, they will not be forced links. If a link has a linkbucks link attached to it, it will have a little heart next to it, like this one . You can click a link like normal, and it won’t be the linkbucks link. The heart itself will be a link to linkbucks. So if you want to support the site, click the heart instead.

This is a voluntary thing. You do not have to support the site if you choose not to. You’ll be able to browse the site just fine without doing it. It will also only be limited to outside links. No internal links will have the heart.

Please keep in mind that the reason why I’m not making more than I’m spending is because I don’t do the typical things that other websites do. I don’t have popups, or page peels, or hidden pages loading, or misleading links (links that take you to another site 60% of the time), or flash ads, or ads that bark at you, or pop up messages. Sure, I have some banner ads on the site, but they are harmless. I even tell people they can disable the ads by using adblock. There is no penalty to using it. My site will function just fine with the ads blocked.

This site is more for you guys, than it is for me. It’s your site, not mine, and I’ll continue to give you guys a good experience while you’re here.

As for the updates lately, I know I’ve been slacking. But for a good reason. After adding the videos, the coding has become too bloated to render on the fly. Which means, none of the pages you’re viewing are cached. Each page calls the database and builds as it loads. It’s causing the site to run sluggish, and it’s taking more server resources than I like. That’s why I’m currently writing a script that will compile each page and save it for viewing. That way the pages load lightening fast. And each day in the middle of the night some time, I’ll have it recompile the pages. So far the compile time takes less than a minute, which is pretty nice for 85 thousand plus pages.

Anyways, I want to know what you guys think about the linkbucks links. Would you use it? Would you not use it? Does this disgust you and would cause you to search elsewhere? Let me know.

© WMI Blog