(now please don’t be deterred by that horny latest preview of Ella today, which admittedly I almost had a wank over myself )
Ok, so I’ve taken up the challenge from our beloved leader ..there he is, cowering in the corner, frantically waving his arms, trying to disassociate from this !
To all the members who visit the blog here and are dissatisfied with the usual content of Lame Girls, I suggest a boycott –
We have probably the most powerful democratising tool ever at our hands, let’s use it.
I cancelled my membership a while ago, but have always been prepared to renew it if they got their act together over there.
It’s such a pity we can’t just poach the girls for this site and see them hosted here instead, but it is how it is.
At 22 euros / $ 27 a month it’s pretty annoying when they barely ever give any real response to members, offer no opportunity to make suggestions or give opinions, and absolutely no chance of any interaction with the girls themselves.
What we do get is the occasional decent set, say 1 in every 8 or 9 ..and the rest are a predictable, hastily shot, heavily edited, unimaginative bunch of ..well …shite usually.
They seem to treat all paying members like a bunch of limp dicks, that they can put out anything they like to, and who won’t do anything about it.
We all know it’s a tease site and neither want nor expect regular porn shoots from them…but Mother Mary, many of these are really lame, particularly now FG have discovered Photoshop.
I propose the obvious, if ALL the members who feel this way here immediately cancelled their subscriptions, with a brief note telling FG why, and what they would like/expect to see before they re-join .. FameGirls would be very foolish and unwise to simply ignore it, especially when their finances have been severely damaged
and let’s face it ..what’s to lose ? .. we can always catch up on any missed sets if we choose to join again, and who knows, WMI might even show his further support by posting some of the better images from these sets for a short while, rather than just the teasers.
But what if it forced them to close shop and shut down ?
Then better still !
We could then have the opportunity to persuade the girls to come over to Web Models Index instead .. or create their own sites even.
Wait, since when were you given new post privileges? Sorry, but this sort of talk doesn’t feel exactly kosher around here. It’s also pretty short sighted.
Echo has had post privileges for quite awhile now. He’s made other posts as well, just hasn’t for some time.
Sure, his post could have used more finesse, but his heart is in the right place. Fame-Girls won’t change because they have no reason to. It’s like some kid who goes to school, and gets kicked in the nuts every day. Until he fights back, his nuts will continue to be kicked.
I don’t like this post at all. It’s a rant that doesn’t have any real grounds. Nobody forces anyone to pay, and it’s not like they offer you something to join and you don’t get it. What you see is what you get, and that is why they have all the previews in the guest site.
With fame-girls there is nowhere in the site where they tell you that the girls will get naked, so why would you expect them to? I would understand the quality of the pictures, but it also doesn’t say that the they are taken by a professional.
I have been member of fame girls several times because I like Ella so much, and I understand your frustrations, but making this rant won’t help at all.
I actually get more frustrated with things like Xbox live where they still fill your entire screen with ads even though you pay, or the cynical removal of great features in Mac OS X (like exposé and spaces).
The majority of people don’t want to see them get naked. We do somewhat get what we are advertised. However, no where on Fame-Girls does it say that it is an artistic site. We don’t pay for blurred out images, or altered colored sets. If I wanted attempted art, I would look at other sites. If I had to choose from 5 purposely blurred images, or not seeing those images at all, I’d go with the latter.
Ella is a perfect example of how Fame-Girls should be, especially her last set (220). If they would do the same with Virginia, there would be no complaints.
Been boycotting FG for many moons already. This is what would it would take for me to sub.
120 images every set. First 20 fully clothed in whatever goofy outfits the trained seals that work at FG chooses for them. Next 80 in various stages of undress participating in general boner inducing behavior. Last 20 fully nude unmolested by epileptic fits of photoshoping. No dildos in the bum or even overly explicit poses, just let me see their beautiful naked bodies and you can have my money.
I totally agree with echo, they need to hear our voice ! I’m doing “reverse-boycotting”, or “positive-supporting” because I don’t have a recurring subscription, I only subscribe whenever we have a few good sets in a row and I expect a few more coming, and then I write a message explaining why I subscribed again. As echo said, the biggest problem with FG is that they never reply to our requests (not even an automated reply to say that our message will be read by some human at some point !), we have no clue where they are going, there is 0 communication. I understand that they need to protect the girls so direct interaction with them is not required, but they could at least publish some news so that we know what’s going on (“doing a shooting today”, “Ella’s going wild in the next set”, …). Even if it’s in Russian, we have translation tools nowadays that will do the job !
I’ve spend my money on worst things. I was never a big sandra fan but damn I really do miss her. As each girl is unique… since sandra is so far behind in set #’s imagine a week with SSVSE
for Mon-Tue-Wed-Thur-Fri till they are on same set #’s
I’m one of those who is in agreement with Echo. These girls are adults and if FG, Ooops! LG owners wants to keep this site strictly non nude the go ahead and see how long they can last. They take one step forward then move 5 back?
If these girls don’t want to do nude, then go ahead and find others who are willing? But I do feel it’s not because of this. More likely it’s the $ they have to fork out for these girls and they are not willing to do so thus you have half baked pictures like this.
My 2 cents worth.
SuMiHa
Guys – This post was really just a reminder that the way that we can change things (for those that would like to see FG get their quality consistently up ) is by numbers – it’s all we’ve got after all.
Apologies if it was a bit heavy handed, but WMI did offer and encourage me to do a post ( I did warn him too ! ) so I took him up on it.
I did stop posting a while ago and will make this my last one, so don’t worry.
Clearly some are happy with what they get for their money – so this post wasn’t actually aimed at them.
I’m also one of those that have joined-quit-re-joined a few times & was a Sandra fan ( who was never replaced, but noticed the price didn’t drop by a third ! ).
Got frustrated when they Never replied & saw the quality drop.
Sure no one forces us to join, and maybe they will improve naturally, but I can see as the girls are now in their 20′s, that they are prepared to reveal a bit more and do more erotic shoots occasionally, but it seems to me that when FG Central get their hands on these sets, they deliberately omit a whole bunch of pics, and piss around with Photoshop to mask or erase the money shots.
Why ?
because they just presume they can string out the same stuff they’ve been doing for years now, and get away with it without any problems – the subscriptions evidently just keep coming in & they can simply ignore those that want it to improve.
The trouble is, things do change, and they are now actively resisting it – the girls are getting older and bolder, but they don’t really like this for simple financial reasons.
Thierry thinks I’m short-sighted, but this is exactly what I’m accusing FG of being !
Thanks WMI for having the kahunas to put up this post and taking some flack for it too, one of great things about this site is providing a largely uncensored forum to voice opinions that may, or may not differ from your own, and being involved, saying what you think as well, rather than some dull promotional spiel. Top Man.
Echo, not every webmaster is a good business man/woman. They have upped some aspects i.e. more tits/ass shots. I’m sure the previous decline in subs woke them up a bit. Being in the food service industry I know that if I’m not innovated or am willing to add/change then people WILL go else where. Then again I can’t change so much as to alienate my core customers. Unless my core gets to small to make a profit. Then again maybe it’s not about the money.
Sure, but Sanvirel I think they are pretty good business people in the strictest sense, they have doubtlessly been turning a good profit for a long time now.
But I don’t credit them with having upped the content, in fact as far as I can see it’s the girls who have done this in recent times, and FG are actually sitting on it and pulling it, so they can keep turning profit from the same content that they have been – extremely short sighted.
Why will they never have a forum like this there ? (it’s where their OWN members post after all !)
because it would lay them bare to questioning…and that’s something they really don’t want — Take it or fuck off, is their attitude.
If anyone doubts this, I’d remind them to take a look again at pictures 115,116,117,118,119 in set 220 of Virginias that they just paid for.
I just finished sending my letter to fame girls. Told them to stop the tricks or I will pull my subscription. Let’s do it.
Way to go Nomax !
Will they(FG owners) listen? Doubt it.
I remembered A4U a few years back. Same thing happened and they managed to get a few girls to go way much further. Girls who are not willing are replaced, pronto.
Of course I want to be proved wrong but having caught up this since 2 years back seen not much changes and seriously doubt it will.
SuMiHa
Fame Girls is one of the worst sites, and I mean worst sites around. Fortunately they have E and V. There are tons of more sophisticated and far more professional sites out there, but unfortunately they don’t have E and V. There in lies the Catch 22. I won’t ever sub cause I get my sets through newsgroups by those willing to share, for which I am grateful. Yes they could show more without getting explicit, but I doubt that will ever happen.
I wanted to see Sandra’s pussy more than Ella, or V…if you could magically make that happen then I ‘might’ consider putting my hand in my pocket.
hey SL ..if I could magically make that happen I’d probably be worth about £4 billion — I’m willing to give it a go though !
Agree completely.
I’ve never been a member of Lame Girls, and I sure won’t sign up in the near future either.
- I have still seen most sets, still won’t pay.