Fame-Girls Virginia Set 161
Another lovely set from Virginia this week. First, I’d like to mention… she has eyebrows! It’s about damn time. Second, there is not a single picture in this set where she takes off her top, pulls her top up, or even teases us with her top. But it’s okay though, because she does a ton of panty teasing. The day she combines both topless with the panty teasing, is the day we’ll have an epic set on our hands.
20 image preview:
boring!!! i guess this is where it all ends for fame-girls…don’t get our hopes up no more…they will always be a tease site, nothing more.
seriously? this is all whoever is running fame-girls got? this set is just so ordinary. panty tease is good if the model has some pubes or some stubble of pubic hair, but virginia is clean shaved…come on, is this really it? is this where the line ends? attention fame-girls owner: you’ll most likely lose members if this kind of sets will go on..come on, these girls are all of legal age already…start a new format!
This is the way the Fame-Girls site has always been. Them letting Virginia go topless IS taking it to the next level. I don’t see why people assume that it has to change. Plenty of us out there who likes it the way it is.
Take Janice for example (the girl added to FG, but removed after 1 set). She was a nude model. She shoved dildos in every hole she has. Did the FG fans want that, or even like that? No. She wasn’t unique. She was just an internet slut.
Besides, I guess I should have added it in my review, but I’ll say it now. The panties she’s wearing is see-through. You DO see slit.
Millions of sites out there where girls shove things in their assholes, but there are very few tease sites. Sometimes tease is enough. If they went further, they would just become some other 18/19 year old slut who gets boring after the first dildo set/video.
i’m not exactly saying that these fame girls should go hardcore…no. my point is, i don’t know if you, webmodelindex sir, is familiar of art-model (?), model like darling or trixie or sparkle, wear see-thru panties that are really see-thru, do more seductive poses. i don’t mean for fame girls to go all the way nude. some topless would be great, maybe some labia and some pubes would be excellent. but..oh well, this is just me…it’s not like my rants would change anything. just saying. i guess fame-girls will only just be fame-girls…boring and oh so ordinary.
This has got to be one of my favorite Virginia sets to date. I don’t need her to get undressed, she looks amazing in these photo’s. The only thing better would be for here hair to be natural color again.
If you don’t like it, just shut up! No need to condemn. This is my fav girl in FG and am pretty sure all the regulars knows about it. I criticize but don’t condemn. Constructive Critisimm is the key here. If you want to condemn go sign up in FG and do so.
As usual WMI thanks and lotsa +(can do that you know?)
SuMiHa
“If you don’t like it, just shut up!”
His criticism of your criticism does not need to be constructive.
It’s free here and complaining and whining ain’t gonna do nothing coz WMI is NOT the owner of FG. He’s posting it for free so say thanks to WMI. If you have any issues with FG models/pics/quality or whatever not within WMI’s control, go sign up at FG and then create havoc there.
SuMiHa
not sure if that was a reply to me, or a new post…..
i’ve never complained
i’ve got no issue with the quality
WMI is a legend
but i do find it humorous to ponit out hypocrisy :p
gotta have a sense of humour in all this mate
people that allow in themselves what they condemn in others are the true scum of this world, for they take, they steal emotion, & give nothing back.
If that is not you, then it is not directed at you.
I just thought it was funny that you used UNCONSTRUCIVE criticism to criticise people for using unconstructive criticism
just funny that’s all
if you recognize that in yourself & change it, then yay!
i love it when ppl become better ppl
but if you think how you phrased it was justified, & can’t see that you demonstrated double standards, then you are just another thief, & that makes me sad…..
i didn’t mean to go on, i really have no issue with you, i was just being humorous, but since you posted it as a reply to me, i enjoy discussion, so i thought i’d add this.
Peace, my friend SuMiHa!
I do enjoy some friendly banter now and then instead of seeing the same post here complain on boring, seen before etc. WMI is being “condemned” for posting the sets but then if you don’t like it, don’t come back, that’s what I’m trying to say.
Peace be with you and all others too!
SuMiHa
(Sorry for the uncoordinated English!)
It’s an ok set. Just needs a little bit more teasing, and too many pictures are almost identical from one another. Virginia continues to (slowly) deliver, thanks Virginia
I’m sort of with both camps on this issue. No one is denying that the FG models are gorgeous and that most of the sets are beautiful. On one hand, you have to give FG and the models credit for not selling out and simply posting hardcore or semi-hardcore models just to make a buck. On the other hand, except for the clothes and the locations, most of the sets are very similar.
I don’t think that that anyone wants the three of them to go hardcore. More along the lines of Playboy and Art Model is another good example. Simple, tasteful nudes or even almost nudes. Kari Sweets also comes to mind.
Also, am I the only one who would simply love to see a shoot of the three of them together?
PS: Someone please tell Ella to stop it with the duck face already.
So, you want another playboy set, antiseptic, so to speak !?
I’d rather go for the works like, for example, Hegre with tasteful nudes in the final stages of their lifecycle, before they become too old and must be replaced. That includes Metart-Style porn, also tastefully made with corresponding accessories and corresponding lewd poses.
Starting out with the innocent underaged and going along with their development from innocence to lewdness, when they have regular sex with their boyfriends.
This concept with revolving girls coming in and being phased out and without the tasteless remarks usually associated with porn might just work very well.
That difference in quality between the pictures of Sandra, and Virginia. Here, the focus is good and the lighting and contrast are perfect . Virginia should have its own site.
Cute girl, but garters without stockings looks kind of silly.
Watch out… More updates!!! **Spoiler Alert**
http://fame-girls.com/prw.php?show=file&path=/updates/552/567-lg.jpg
http://fame-girls.com/prw.php?show=file&path=/updates/557/572-lg.jpg
http://fame-girls.com/prw.php?show=file&path=/updates/558/573-lg.jpg
…!!