Fame-Girls Virginia Set 214

Published by webmodelsindex on June 26th, 2012 - in Model Updates

Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

You’ve got to be kidding me. I’ve been further even more decided to use even go need to do look more as anyone can. Can you really be far even as decided half as much to use go wish for that? My guess is that when one really been far even as decided once to use even go want, it is then that she has really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like. It’s just common sense.

No, I’m not having a seizure. The previous statement best describes this set. How so? It makes no fucking sense. Even Virginia is sad, as you can tell from the picture above.

I assumed that the hands were there as a sort of tease, and that she would remove them throughout the set. I also assumed that her panties were fully mesh. Seems I was wrong on both counts. The hands do not get removed, and the panties have a panty guard. So why the fuck are the hands there in the first place? We’ve seen plenty of shots of her nipples, so no reason to cover them. The hand on top of her panties makes no sense as well. When the hand does get pushed up, we see nothing underneath by skin. This set is just a big fuck you to the customers.

At image 100, she removes the bikini top. However, she keeps the white shirt on, so we can’t see anything. For the last 3 images, she removes her panties. Again, white shirt on, can’t see anything. Why even take the bikini off if she is going to keep her whole body covered with the shirt? At image 111, a tit did pop out. I’ll give her that. But it’s one single nipple. One. The other 113 images are just rubbish.

This set was not sexy. It was not hot, or titillating, or even close to being “okay”. It was shit, end of story.

There are no more Virginia sets uploaded, so I can’t post a preview for her next set. Sorry!

20 Image Preview: No Support Link


43 Responses

  1. cookiemonster says:

    Do you think that the lack of Virginia’s previews is a bad sign for the site? I don’t think they would leave the site open with just Ella. It wouldn’t make sense at all.

    What is your take on this WMI?

    • There is no mention in the members area, or on the public part of the site that Virginia has quit, so I’m not sure about her current status. I do find it strange though that the next three Ella sets are the last three uploaded, and there is a gap in between each one. So either they are going to make it alternate between Virginia and Ella (no more 2, then 1), or Virginia has left and they are just going to do Ella every other release day. All we can do is just wait and find out.

    • Sad and Confused says:

      I heard on a couple of forums that Virginia was leaving but I thought it was guys trolling for responses.I am actually starting to think it may be possible now with the lack of previews being posted. On the other hand I also heard from a much more trusted source that the queen of fame-girls (Sandra)is about to make a return as she has recently split from her husband and is now free from his influence. Apparently she is keen to get back in front of the camera again. Not knowing what having the baby has done to her body I am not sure it will be a good idea for her.Don’t take this as gospel, although as I said earlier it was from a trusted source and usually what he tells me is accurate.

  2. echo says:

    Despite your less than favourable review, I’m still interested to see this set – she at least looks less mechanical from your previews (maybe it’s aided by the cramped bathroom with crappy peach tiling, bubble-wrap curtain & washing machine).

    This set looks like a warm up to the real shoot, but in your preview no.8 she lifts the hand to show her slit (still there in 9, 10 & 12) nice big hard nip on 12 ..yeah, I’m still keen to see this set.

    Admittedly the halloween hand on no.2 does seem to be giving us the ‘two fingered salute’ ..but I’d of arranged the same myself, in fact I would definitely have had the panty hand displaying the stiff middle finger throughout.

    ~ echo’s over long and unnecessarily rambling reviews.com ~

  3. Sad and Confused says:

    Just thought I would check after reading the first couple of paragraphs…… have you just had a stroke? coz i can’t even get close to what you were trying to say there.

  4. GoustiFruit says:

    “Why even take the bikini off if she is going to keep her whole body covered with the shirt?”
    Exactly the feeling I had with the previous set from Ella, she removed her panties and you were all excited, but I only saw a pair of panties on her knees, nothing else.

    About this set, what a deception :’-( Everything was in place for a good one, Virginia is looking good, sexy outfit, playing in front of the mirror… and then… well, nothing.

    • It wasn’t about seeing snatch with Ella, it was the panties around the thighs thing. I find that hot. My 3rd ex ago used to do that when she was horny. She always wore a skirt, and when she wanted some action, she would pull her panties down to her thighs. Didn’t matter where we were.

  5. NiB says:

    they just updated the previews, next virgina set looks like it might be better(maybe)
    but yea this set makes no sense to me, why the hands if she’s not gonna take them of, why is she in front of the shower and not even using the drapes? why make a set that is less reviling than any of her set in a year?(ok that might be an exaggeration)

  6. tomsay says:

    new previue is up for V looks great nip is alwase a good singh

  7. Kilborn says:

    Looks like they have changed the preview links… the next V is 713/735

  8. Kilborn says:

    There is also a new E at 712/734

  9. Buckweed says:

    Haha, I started reading that review 5 times, but never really made it trough the first paragraph, before I just decided to skip it an read on….then I got the explanation, good one =)

    So, it was all smoke and mirrors, again….bleh…typical. =/

    Great review though.

  10. David says:

    preview for Virginia is up and they moved some around.

  11. ramstone says:

    Your opening statement made me think i was having a stroke. If the girls have any desire to do this for money any longer they need to part ways with whoever or whatever fame-girls is. They also need to get naked. I am talking playboy style nudity nothing more.

  12. Ludwig55 says:

    Hello,

    Virginia will continue in a higher resolution (5616 x 3744) but with the same shit of photographer (white clothes in front of white background). The 2nd of July preview shows it:
    http://www.fame-girls.com/prw.php?show=file&path=/updates/713/735-lg.jpg

    Yours
    Ludwig55

    • I noticed the resolutions too. All 4 new previews have a resolution of 3744×5616 (vertical), which is insane. Some of the previews I grabbed were over 3mb in size each. Which means, the zips are going to be much bigger again.

  13. monkey says:

    I predict mediocre.

    While not technically right (it was worse than mediocre), I still called it.

  14. divine says:

    Finally some new updates on the site. WMI, did you happen to grab more then one pic? 736 looks like a killer to me….
    BTT: Agree with your review, a shame they were so inconsequent with the outfit. But hey, let’s look forward to tomorrows ella set ;-)

  15. alex says:

    Can you post the previews in your blog for everyone to see ?

  16. mable says:

    I’m beginning to find you blog more interesting than the latest pictures – it’s sad…(no offense to your blog BTW)

You must be logged in to post a comment.


© WMI Blog