Fame-Girls Virginia Set 222

Published by webmodelsindex on July 31st, 2012 - in Model Updates

A wee bit better. Still sucked, but it’s a better form of crap. Like the difference between solid poo, and diarrhea. One just stinks less.

She managed to pull off more poses than the usual standing there and turning. Some sitting, some standing, some using the chair as a prop, that sort of thing. No where near Ella in the sitting department, but it’s a nice change. But just imagine if Virginia would do the rolling around on the ground that Ella does, her sets would be 10x better. I don’t mean the spread and such, but just some diversity.

It also appears that I was wrong about the no panty part, I just couldn’t see the strap through the dress in the previews. As you can see above, they do come off, so does that make me partially right? We actually got to see her leading up to removing them as well. No more “on in one pic, gone the next” type of thing. The panties themselves are see-through, but I think there was only a single picture where you could see anything. Need a photo editor to adjust the lighting though.

My one true complaint about this set is the lack of titties. When her dress came off at the very end, there were only three partial nipple shots. Yep, that’s it. Not enough to wet my appetite. They were more of a snack. A yummy snack, but still not a meal. And I’m killing the hell out of that analogy.

To sum it all up: + good quality photos, + build up to the removal of the panties and dress, + pose diversity, – nipples and titties, – lack of pose diversity (see what I did there?), – same shit, different day.

Not sure what her set will be next week since there are no more sets for her uploaded. There is a gap in the sets for Ella next week, so I know there is a spot waiting for Virginia. Just need to wait for those over at Fame-Girls to upload it. Kinda strange. We have three more weeks of previews for Ella, but not a single one for Virginia.

20 Image Preview: Say Thanks! Link | Direct Link


11 Responses

  1. echo says:

    Well my complaint here is your common mispelling of ‘wet my appetite’, it should of course, be spelt ‘whet my appetite’.

    The allusion is to the sharpening of tools on a whetstone (grindstone) and to whet means just to sharpen. So, ‘whetting our appetite’ is ‘sharpening our appetite’.

    Seems you were messing around in class once more Mr WMI, probably trying to look up girls skirts again, no doubt.

    C –
    Must do better – See me after school.

  2. echo says:

    Ps. I just misspelt ‘misspelling’.
    I obviously need a good thrashing for that.

    I must not misspell misspelling
    I must not misspell misspelling
    I must not misspell misspelling
    I must not misspell misspelling
    I must not misspell misspelling
    I must not misspell misspelling
    I must not misspell misspelling
    etc. and so on ……….

  3. sanvirel says:

    a damn store mannequin would have looked better… I used to rush home from work to get her sets, This time I stayed and had a couple drinks with co-workers…should have just kept drinking :(

  4. GoustiFruit says:

    Duh, I really didn’t like this one :-(
    Ugly panties, makes me think of 80′s brazilian bikinis, ugly. Ugly dress. Useless set.
    Recently someone posted a lot of her older sets in the newsgroups, I was surprised to find some really good ones I had totally forgotten about (as I’m no collector); time goes fast, she was already exposing her tits like 2 years ago, and we had more of them than in her recent sets ! :-o I think the problem is that they keep asking her to spread her legs, which she doesn’t like, instead of focusing on what she likes, that is showing her tits. So we always have 105 useless, boring pictures of her posing standing, until they realize “ok, you won’t show your pussy… let’s do 5 pictures of your titties to finish the shooting”. But I remember that Virgina used to like showing her ass too, so why can’t they do decent sets of her with only tits and ass ? She would happily comply, so why have her frown the whole set because she doesn’t want to spread her legs, instead of having her smile the whole set by showing her butt and boobs ??? And, damn it, have Ella and Virginia pose together !!! (unless they hate each other ? Oh, it could still be good ;-) )

  5. xsnred says:

    Just dl this set and it looks like V needs a break. She’s just as bored as we are. She should be told to take a month off and collect herself, come back when her sexiness is back on her facial expression because right now she is hurting the business. I too used to live for Mondays Wednesdays and Fridays, key word, used to. And thanks to WMI for this site which I visit at least 10 times a day to get the latest updates.

    On a different note WMI, my password only works when I cut and paste it from the email you sent me. I’ve tried everything and every which way to type it in and still does not work. Any suggestions?

    • I’m guessing it’s case sensitive. Not sure what the registration password looks like (lowercase and uppercase). Try logging in, then changing your password (if that’s even an option). Or save it in your browser stored password list.

  6. sandraslegs says:

    well I just have to laugh, everytime it is ‘hopefully the next set will get better’.
    That began to happen with Sandra too, so I am glad that she quit.
    WMI what’s going on with met-art?

    • What do you mean by what’s going on with Met-Art? If you mean the lack of sets in the past couple days, I’ve been busy. I’ll add some more soon.

      • sandraslegs says:

        My apologies, I just found the ones you have added and indexed…Sorry, I thought there would be updates on the blog like you have with FG.
        I wonder though shouldn’t you have the model’s set names too for easier reference?
        Indeed, you have been busy, I applaud you with one hand.

        • Your comment was flagged as spam for some reason.

          Anyways, the way that I am adding each set to the website is by using the free hosted galleries in the webmaster area of Met-Art. It’s all automated. I enter a url to a FHG in a script I wrote, and it: adds the model to the database if she isn’t added, grabs the bio and thumbnail picture of the model if there isn’t one added for that model yet, downloads every image from the FHG and resizes based on the dimensions my site uses, and adds them to the correct folder. I’m sure I could add the actual set name to the database, but that is a ton more work. Especially for those who are already added. Besides, it goes against the theme and style of my website. All sets are listed as numbers, since 99% of the sites out there use number based sets.

  7. sandraslegs says:

    I just grabbed this set, it isn’t so bad…Virginia has attractive legs.
    I suppose the review lowered my already lowered expectations. lol.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


© WMI Blog