There have been quite a few comments lately about how the owner of Fame-Girls had edited Virginia’s latest set to hide her pussy. I’m here to tell you guys, it’s not true. None of the images in her 170th set has been altered. I come to you today with proof of that fact.
The 3 images in question are these:
(Click for the larger images)
The first image is impossible to see her pussy because of the way she is sitting, and the angle of the camera. The third one as well. The angle is too close to her thigh. That leaves the middle one. Should her pussy be visible in that pictures? Yes, BUT, because of the shape of her pussy, it’s not visible. I’ll explain why in a second.
If this was someone else, say Ella for example, her pussy would have been visible. That’s because Ella has a huge pussy. Her lips are insanely huge. An example would be in this picture:
(Click for the larger image)
See how her pussy protrudes outwards? Because of that, if she were the one in the second image above, her pussy would have been visible. Well, part of it would have been.
Virginia has a completely different type of pussy lips. Hers is a lot more narrow, and does not protrude outward. Because of that, her slit is not visible because her dress is BARELY covering it. Want proof? Here ya go!
I took image 76 from set 168 of Virginia’s, and ran it through Adobe. I changed the color balance, hue and saturation, and lighting. Nothing else was altered. By doing so, I tried to match her pussy to her skin color the best I could, and by doing so made it very visible. Here is the original image:
(Click for the larger image)
And here are the different stages of the color and light alterations:
As you can see from the different stages above, Virginia has a very narrow pussy. Her slit is not protruding because she has very small lips. Now if you compare the last image directly above to the second image at the top, you would be able to see her slit would not be visible in set 170.
Still don’t see it?
So don’t give up on Fame-Girls just yet. They haven’t been editing sets for the past few months, and there is no reason for them to start that up again. Save your judgments after the next few weeks. Some of the upcoming sets from all three girls look like they might be really great.
regardless wmi. from the photo comparison with the arrow you placed, at least the labia would have been visible, but it looks like it was erased. whatever it is we can believe what we want, its a matter of ones opinion.
lol – and I thought I had too much time on my hands when I picked over Ella’s 166 set in the blog !
keep up the good work wmi
Thank for your pseudo scientific explanation, I had a good laugh too
But really I don’t care that much:
1- even if they photoshoped Virginia, in the best case we would have seen like 4 pixels of pussy on the whole set
2- she’ll show more and more with time (hopefully), at least Virginia delivers (some) for her fans
If she’s got the good “attitude”, shows a tit here and there, and continues to progress, it’s enough to make me happy.
Sandra is off for me, and I’m starting to think that Ella is soon to be too.
FG managers: let convince Ella to be more adventurous or create a site for Virginia alone.
what set is this from:
http://blog.webmodelsindex.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/e143-01.jpg
Set 143
thanks!
Virginia est sexy et pure.
il faut la garder comme un tableau de nu
My 2 cents worth:
Did a little “digging” myself and all the pictures have these header:
ÿØÿà JFIF ÿþ ;CREATOR: gd-jpeg v1.0 (using IJG JPEG v62), quality = 95
ÿÛ C
ÿÛ C
ÿÀ
° ” ÿÄ
ÿÄ µ } !1AQa”q2‘¡#B±ÁRÑð$3br‚
%&’()
Meaning that it’s created/encoded with this program. It didn’t show the model of the camera neither did it show the program it WAS edited in. It will show that’s from my experience after editing.
SuMiHa
Do a quick google search for: CREATOR: gd-jpeg v1.0 (using IJG JPEG v62)
You’ll see that it doesn’t mean the image was edited. It’s what happens when you use php to push the image to the browser. I can do the same thing with the images on my site. It’s just the header php places on the images.
Open the Ella picture in this blog post above, and you’ll see it was edited with Photoshop
But seriously though. I know people want to believe this set was edited because they want some reason to hate on Fame-Girls for taking their sweet time upping the game. Maybe they will, maybe they won’t. If people want to give up and move on to some other models, I’m okay with that. But I’ll keep posting them anyways, so when you decide to come back, you know where to find them
Agreed! Let her keep teasing until such time that you have to post under another section(with the bay you never know anymore right?)
SuMiHa